Home » Aerospace and defense » The Future of Software Licensing: The Importance of an Optimal License Model in Divestitures
When a company spins off a business unit, the spotlight often shines on financials, operations, and IT infrastructure. Yet, hidden within the fine print of software contracts lies a strategic lever that can make or break the success of a divestiture: licensing. In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, where hybrid cloud, SaaS, and AI-driven platforms reign supreme, software licensing has transcended its role as a mere compliance checkbox. It has become a critical enabler of agility, innovation, and cost control. However, many organizations still underestimate the complexity and opportunity embedded in licensing decisions during a carve-out or spin-off.
Predictive analytics and AI are revolutionizing license management, enabling organizations to simulate cost scenarios, forecast usage, and identify compliance risks before they materialize. Licensing strategy connects to broader IT transformation themes, cloud migration, cybersecurity, and digital workplace enablement. In the future of software licensing, the winners won’t just be compliant, they’ll be ready.
Divestitures are high-stakes operations. They demand speed, precision, and foresight—especially when it comes to software licensing. Yet, licensing is often treated as an afterthought, buried beneath infrastructure planning and financial modeling. That’s a costly mistake.
Optimal license models can accelerate Day 1 readiness, reduce stranded costs, and foster innovation in the new company (NewCo). Real-world transitions, such as IBM’s ELA renegotiations and Broadcom’s shift away from perpetual VMware licenses, illustrate the pitfalls of poor planning and the power of early action. Whether navigating a carve-out, spin-off, or joint venture, organizations that treat licensing as a strategic lever, not just a compliance concern, gain a critical edge.
To navigate the complexities of software licensing during divestitures, consider these three critical aspects:
These activities are essential to avoid compliance gaps, unexpected costs, and service disruptions. This framework ensures that licensing transitions are not only technically sound but also contractually enforceable and operationally aligned.
Software licensing has long been reactive. Organizations discover compliance issues during audits, realize overspending after renewals, and scramble to adjust when usage patterns shift. But that model is no longer sustainable, especially during divestitures, where every decision is magnified.
Today’s advanced Software License Management (SLM) tools transform how organizations approach licensing. Instead of reacting to problems, companies can now anticipate them, simulate outcomes, and optimize proactively.
As we delve deeper into the future of software licensing, it’s essential to understand how predictive analytics and AI are transforming license management, making it more proactive and strategic.
This allows CIOs and procurement leads to make data-backed decisions, avoiding both over-licensing and costly shortfalls.
Software licensing doesn’t just follow transformation—it shapes it. Whether migrating to the cloud, modernizing cybersecurity, or enabling a digital workplace, the licensing model you choose can either accelerate or constrain your progress.
During a divestiture, this becomes even more critical. The NewCo must often build a modern IT environment from scratch, under tight timelines and with limited resources. Licensing decisions made early in the process can unlock agility, reduce technical debt, and future-proof operations.
Table 1 below maps common licensing models to typical divestiture scenarios and transformation goals to help CIOs and transformation leaders make informed choices.
| Licensing Model | Best Fit For | Transformation Archetype | Strategic Benefits |
| Subscription-Based | SaaS-first environments | Spin-Offs, Cloud-First Carve-Outs | Flexibility, scalability, predictable costs |
| Consumption-Based | AI/ML workloads, cloud-native apps | Innovation Labs, Edge Deployments | Pay-as-you-grow, aligns with usage spikes |
| Perpetual Licensing | Legacy systems, regulated sectors | Transitional Service Agreements (TSAs) | Stability, compliance continuity |
| Hybrid Licensing | Mixed on-prem/cloud environments | Joint Ventures, Gradual Migrations | Balances control with modernization |
| Bring-Your-Own-License (BYOL) | Multi-cloud strategies | Sovereign Cloud, Global Expansion | Portability, vendor flexibility |
This framework helps organizations match licensing strategy to transformation intent, ensuring that IT investments are not only compliant but also catalytic. Figure 1 illustrates the subscription-based licensing model, highlighting its suitability for SaaS-first environments and its strategic benefits in spin-offs and cloud-first carve-outs.

Software licensing is no longer about access; it’s about adaptability. As digital ecosystems evolve, so must the frameworks that govern how software is consumed, shared, and monetized. For organizations navigating divestitures today, understanding where licensing is headed tomorrow is essential for building resilient, future-ready operating models.
As divestitures become more frequent and digitally complex, software licensing is emerging as a critical enabler of operational success, not just a compliance hurdle. From leveraging predictive analytics to navigating vendor lock-in, the most successful transitions treat licensing as a living, evolving component of the IT landscape. As AI-generated workloads, edge computing, and sovereign cloud requirements reshape the digital frontier, licensing strategies must evolve in parallel. The future of software licensing is intelligent, adaptive, and deeply intertwined with broader transformation goals. Organizations can turn a traditionally reactive function into a source of competitive advantage by planning early, engaging in the right tools and expertise, and aligning licensing models with business outcomes.
By Francisco Trevino, Manager
Avasant’s research and other publications are based on information from the best available sources and Avasant’s independent assessment and analysis at the time of publication. Avasant takes no responsibility and assumes no liability for any error/omission or the accuracy of information contained in its research publications. Avasant does not endorse any provider, product or service described in its RadarView™ publications or any other research publications that it makes available to its users, and does not advise users to select only those providers recognized in these publications. Avasant disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. None of the graphics, descriptions, research, excerpts, samples or any other content provided in the report(s) or any of its research publications may be reprinted, reproduced, redistributed or used for any external commercial purpose without prior permission from Avasant, LLC. All rights are reserved by Avasant, LLC.
Login to get free content each month and build your personal library at Avasant.com