• Grid View
  • List View
SUBSCRIPTION
PLANS
  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Central IS Budget Allocations by Organization Revenue TriMark - 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Central IS Budget Allocations by Organization Revenue TriMark – 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The IS Budget Allocations TriMark compares the average spending in major budget categories for the years from 1998 to 2000. The IS Budget Allocations TriMark process is designed to provide IT executives with a strategic comparison of budget allocations over an entire decade of IT spending.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Central IS Budgets as a Percentage of Revenue InfoTechMark: TriMark 1998 to 2000 and DeciMark 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Central IS Budgets as a Percentage of Revenue InfoTechMark: TriMark 1998 to 2000 and DeciMark 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The Central IS Budgets as a Percentage of Revenue InfoTechMark shows the relationship of the IS budget to the organization's revenue. For government organizations, the IS budget is compared to total spending for operations. Results are presented for each sector or by organization revenue. The lower quartile (25th percentile) presents the lowest 25 percent of spending by all of the organizations, where 25 percent spent less than that amount. The median (50th percentile) is the level at which half of the organizations spent less and the remainder spent more. The upper quartile (75th percentile) presents the highest 25 percent of spending by all of the organizations, where 25 percent spent more than that amount.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Central IS Spending Per Employee TriMark-1998 to 2000 and DeciMark-1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Central IS Spending Per Employee TriMark-1998 to 2000 and DeciMark-1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The Central IS Spending Per Employee InfoTechMark provides a measure of IS productivity for each sector or organization size. Results are provided for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile. The figure includes the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile amounts of spending per employee. The lower quartile (25th percentile) presents the lowest 25 percent of spending by all of the organizations, where 25 percent spent less than that amount. The median (50th percentile) is the level at which half of the organizations spent less and the remainder spent more. The upper quartile (75th percentile) presents the highest 25 percent of spending by all of the organizations, where 25 percent spent more than that amount.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Workers Supported Per IS Employee DeciMark - 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Workers Supported Per IS Employee DeciMark – 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Workers Supported Per IS Employee DeciMark shows another measure of IS productivity. The lower quartile, median, and upper quartile are presented. The lower quartile (25th percentile) presents the lowest 25 percent of workers supported in all of the organizations, where 25 percent supported less than that amount. The median (50th percentile) is the level at which half of the organizations supported less and the remainder supported more. The upper quartile (75th percentile) presents the highest 25 percent of workers supported in all of the organizations, where 25 percent supported more than that amount. Results are presented for industry sector and by organization revenue for the period of 1991 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Workers Supported Per IS Employee TriMark - 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Workers Supported Per IS Employee TriMark – 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Workers Supported Per IS Employee TriMark shows another measure of IS productivity. The lower quartile, median, and upper quartile are presented. The lower quartile (25th percentile) presents the lowest 25 percent of workers supported in all of the organizations, where 25 percent supported less than that amount. The median (50th percentile) is the level at which half of the organizations supported less and the remainder supported more. The upper quartile (75th percentile) presents the highest 25 percent of workers supported in all of the organizations, where 25 percent supported more than that amount. Results are presented for industry sector and by organization size for the period of 1998 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - IS Budget Changes InfoTechMark: TriMark 1998 to 2000 and DeciMark 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Budget Changes InfoTechMark: TriMark 1998 to 2000 and DeciMark 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The IS Budget Changes InfoTechMark shows the direction of budget trends for each sector or by organization revenue. This benchmark is useful to IS managers or staff seeking the direction IS budgets are taking within their sector. The IS Budget Changes TriMark shows average budget changes for 1998 to 2000. The IS Budget Changes DeciMark shows average budget changes for 1991 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Spending Benchmarks - Central IS Budget Allocations DeciMark - 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    Central IS Budget Allocations DeciMark – 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The IS Budget Allocations DeciMark compares the average spending in major budget categories for the years from 1991 to 2000. The IS Budget Allocations DeciMark process is designed to provide IT executives with a strategic comparison of budget allocations over an entire decade of IT spending.

    February, 2001

  • IT Staffing - IS Staffing Trends DeciMark - 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Trends DeciMark – 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The IS Staffing Trends DeciMark provides an overview of staff changes for each sector or by organization revenue. The differences between staff increases and decreases provide an indicator of whether the sector is experiencing staffing shortages or excesses. Results are presented for the period of 1991 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Staffing - IS Staffing Mix by Job Function TriMark - 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Mix by Job Function TriMark – 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Mix by Job Function TriMark provides a breakdown by average percentage for each major IS labor category. Results are presented for industry sector and by organization size for the period of 1998 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Staffing - IS Staffing Mix by Job Function DeciMark - 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Mix by Job Function DeciMark – 1991 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Mix by Job Function DeciMark provides a breakdown by average percentage for each major IS labor category. Results are presented for each industry sector and by organization revenue for the period of 1991 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • IT Staffing - IS Staffing Trends TriMark - 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    IS Staffing Trends TriMark – 1998 to 2000 (Feb 2001)

    The IS Staffing Trends TriMark provides an overview of staff changes for each sector or organization size. The differences between staff increases and decreases provide an indicator of whether the sector is experiencing staffing shortages or excesses. Results are presented for the period of 1998 to 2000.

    February, 2001

  • Technology Trends - NIST Advanced Measurement Laboratory (Jan 2001)

    NIST Advanced Measurement Laboratory (Jan 2001)

    The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an agency of the Commerce Department’s Technology Administration, has embarked upon a $174 million construction project to build one of the most technologically advanced buildings in the world, the NIST Advanced Measurement Laboratory (AML), in Gaithersburg, Maryland.

    January, 2001

  • IT Salaries - IT Salary Report Archives (1998-2001)

    IT Salary Report Archives (1998-2001)

    These archives provides historical access to previous editions of our IT salary studies. The archives include the 2001 Salary Report (first half and second half of 2001), the 2000 Salary Report, the 1999 Salary Report, and the 1998 Salary Report.

    January, 2001

  • IT Best Practices - E-Commerce Site Security Pays Off (Oct 2000)

    E-Commerce Site Security Pays Off (Oct 2000)

    Virus attacks, credit card fraud, website content modifications, proprietary information theft, and denial of service are all reasons to recognize that protecting e-commerce is essential. Failure to do so will cost your company in dollars and cents. Not only is your organization susceptible to lawsuits from customers and business partners, but also many users are uncomfortable using e-commerce for purchasing because of these threats.

    October, 2000

  • Technology Trends - Networked B2B Applications Point Toward the Future

    Networked B2B Applications Point Toward the Future

    A new direction in business-to-business e-commerce is emerging. Integration and collaboration are becoming the watchwords for new B2B ventures. The rationale for bringing suppliers, subcontractors, employees, and customers under a single Internet entity is clear. Returns expected from these collaborations is expected to be many times the investment and the return period will be measured in months, not years.

    October, 2000